Google Apps and a Tale of Two Cities

IFWT_lapd.png

As the London Borough of Hillingdon stakes its claim to becoming the first local authority in the UK to move to Cloud Computing with Google Apps, the City of Los Angeles has scaled back its own Cloud ambitions.

LA’s relationship with Google and its systems integrator CSC has been on rocky ground for many months, but shortly before Christmas the Los Angeles City Council voted to scale back its plans after concluding that Google’s technology could not meet the security needs of crucial departments including the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the city attorney's office.

Los Angeles officials originally expected to roll Google Apps out to its 30,000 users by June 2010, in partnership with CSC. But that number has been reduced to about 17,000 employees, largely because of security objections raised by the LAPD.

In a unanimous vote, the City Council decided to change the terms of its $7.2-million contract with Google so that LAPD employees and others will stay on an older on-site Novell email system. Google will pay up to $350,000 per year for those employees to use that system.

When the contract was signed, Los Angeles also received a $250,000 advance as part of an agreement to encourage other cities to adopt the Google system. The city will now get to keep that money independent of whether it promotes the system.

The city will continue using Google's email system for 17,000 other employees, but officials said that Google "does not have the technical ability to comply with the city's security requirements" and that those requirements are "not currently compatible with Cloud Computing."

Maggie Goodrich, Los Angeles Police Department CIO, admitted:   

It will be difficult for law enforcement to move to a Cloud solution until the [security requirements] and Cloud are more in line with each other. There was definitely a time when Google seemed positive they were going to meet the requirements.
 

In its defence Google has insisted that the security requirements now being cited were not part of the original brief when it bid for the contract. A spokesman stated:   

We're disappointed that the city introduced requirements for the LAPD after the contract was signed that are, in its own words, 'currently incompatible with Cloud Computing’. Even so, Los Angeles taxpayers have already saved more than two million dollars and the City expects to save millions more in the years ahead.
 

But it’s clearly a major set back for Google which won the contract with Los Angeles against stiff competition from Microsoft and which has been touting LA as a flagship example of how cities and local authorities can take advantage of Cloud Computing. One US lobbyist Consumer Watchdog is demanding that the city council asks Google to remove a video from the Google Enterprise Blog promoting LA’s choice of Google Apps.

Jamie Court, Consumer Watchdog President, stated:   

Google Apps has failed Los Angeles, but the deceptive marketing video gives the false impression that the system was successful here. That creates a first impression of credibility for Google that will mislead other communities. Given the failed Los Angeles Google project, you must demand that the inaccurate video be removed immediately. As long as it remains, the City is complicit in Google's deceptive marketing. You have an obligation to tell the truth about the Los Angeles experience and how Google could not meet security requirements.
 

Court added:   

 

The problem is Google not only made misrepresentations to the City, but also continues to make them to potential Google Apps For Government customers by using the deceptive video. It matters because other governments and public entities... are actively considering implementing Google Apps. Allowing the video to remain on Google's website misleads potential customers. Ultimately it can only tarnish the City's reputation. You have an obligation to be truthful about Google's failure in Los Angeles.
 

But other US cities continue to commit to Google Apps. Pittsburgh City Council has announced the completion of a move from Microsoft to Google Apps for Government, albeit on a smaller scale – a $400,000 deal involving 3000 employees.

The city will spend $150,000 to $170,000 annually on licensing fees, down about 25 percent from what it has spent under the old system, according to Howard Stern, the city's outgoing CIO.

Interestingly the Pittsburgh deal does include 1,500 law enforcement users, including the Pittsburgh Police Department. Stern said he was comfortable that the Google roll out met necessary security standards:   

While the city still retains full ownership of our data, we can count on Google for data safety and security. Our data is more secure with Google than with the previous system.
 

But he admitted:   

We are watching [the Los Angeles situation] closely, and we will continue to watch it closely,
 

For his part, Luke Ravenstahl, Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, used the Google Enterprise blog to trumpet his pleasure about the move:   

This move will save us 25 percent or more in annual email support costs and allow us to deliver better services to our residents. Our employees are working more efficiently because they have 500 times more email storage and no longer need to waste time emptying their inboxes. We’re also able to capture and index all employees’ email and attachments in one centralised and searchable repository, which helps us meet e-discovery needs much more efficiently.
 

Meanwhile in the UK the London Borough of Hillingdon hopes that an imminent half a million pound move to begin using Google Apps for Business means it will become the first local authority in the UK to take this big a step into Cloud-based working.

It has approved a plan to shift its 3,500 staff to using the Web-based applications, which will include email, calendar, documents, word processing, instant messaging and voice and videoconferencing. Hillingdon expects the move to improve internal collaboration and productivity, giving it the scope to develop new ways of working, and produce savings of £2.98m, compared to maintaining the traditional desktop PC, over the next four years.

Another expected benefit is that by reducing the need for local storage and server space to hold email and other data it will be able to reduce its carbon footprint. The move will be facilitated through a contract with Cloudreach, a reseller of Google Apps for Business, to last for four years with the option to extend for two one year periods. The contract has been valued at £540,000 over four years with Cloudreach.

Councillor Jonathan Bianco, cabinet member for finance, property and business services, said:   

Going with Google makes the most sense for Hillingdon economically and it will enable us to realise the tremendous opportunities afforded by Cloud computing. Doing this means we're ahead of the curve in anticipating the changes in technology over the coming years. It also means we'll have more opportunities to look at how we communicate with local residents and organisations in the borough, such as remote working. Simply, it makes both financial and business transformational sense to make the change.
 

tags for Google Apps and a Tale of Two Cities

Now on techcloud 9

Commenting on the cloud

Next | Previous

Twitter feed

Tag cloud